From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Sep 5 11:12:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F3637B43E for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA20141; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e85IC1L23382; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:12:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:12:01 -0400 (EDT) To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: John Baldwin , Doug Rabson , alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Jacob writes: > > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you can have a "bus 0" on many different hoses. Eg, its directly tied to the nexus & not behind a ppb. Does that make sense? > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses). Actually, that would be the most interesting to test. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message