Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:20:41 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Subject: Re: 1:1 threading. Message-ID: <3E843009.2060104@tcoip.com.br> In-Reply-To: <005201c2f4c8$517da320$f001a8c0@davidw2k> References: <20030327143259.I64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <005201c2f4c8$517da320$f001a8c0@davidw2k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Xu wrote:
>
> do you think that a multithreaded process should use more CPU time then
> a single thread process, so threaded process should have higher priority
> and block other single thread processes out? AFAIK, threading is not
> designed for this, you may misunderstand what threading is designed for.
Threading might not have been originally designed for this, but a lot of
people use it this way, a lot of people *want* it this way, and POSIX
specifically mandates that this way be available.
So let's drop that issue, please.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
TCO
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
dcs@tcoip.com.br
Outros:
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net
After an instrument has been assembled, extra components will be found
on the bench.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E843009.2060104>