From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 18 7:34:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4895137B40F; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (relay2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.10.1/8.11.3-2) with ESMTP id f8IEXY616099; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:33:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (root@kawoserv.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.180.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.10.1/8.11.3/6) with ESMTP id f8IEXRx16089; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:33:27 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (root@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.148]) by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01472; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:33:25 +0200 Received: (from alex@localhost) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f8IEXqA91027; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:33:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alex) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:33:52 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard , "Daniel O'Connor" , Robert Withrow Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Message-ID: <20010918163352.F90244@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20010918160602.B90244@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from darius@dons.net.au on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:48:34PM +0930 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Daniel O'Connor (darius@dons.net.au): > Yes, I suspect the answer is along the lines of 'yes that's coming' :) :-) > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, but b) > workable in the current package framework I suspect.. Yes, would be a nice workaround. I don't use packages, though :) Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message