From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:29:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C7116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:29:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF81643D2D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:29:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CMTb7E034275; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:29:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200401122229.i0CMTb7E034275@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:29:37 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis To: dwhite@gumbysoft.com In-Reply-To: <20040112141254.V54897@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: mi@aldan.algebra.com cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: core-dumping over NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:29:55 -0000 On 12 Jan, Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 12 Jan, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> >> > . 5.2-CURRENT (Dec 14) server, RedHat-9 client: >> > core is created properly, but sometimes the server goes >> > into a frenzy with the sys-component (bufdaemon) taking >> > up the entire 100% of the CPU-time (P4 at 2GHz); it only >> > writes @4Mb/s (~14% of the disk's bandwidth) and the >> > only cure is to restart the /etc/rc.d/nfsd; trying to, >> > for example, switch from X11 to a textual console, when >> > this is happening reliably hangs the machine. >> >> I saw something similar a in the last month when running iozone on a >> FreeBSD client with an nfs file system mounted from a FreeBSD server. I >> think this was in the 5.2-BETA timeframe. The client typically ran out >> of CPU first, but the server was not far behind. This happened in the >> tests with the larger file and/or block sizes. Bufdaemon was typically >> the big consumer of CPU. > > Hm, I can attempt to reproduce this on 5.2-rel or -current. Can you > provide the options used to iozone? I think I used the defaults other than cranking up the max file size go 1GB to match the memory size on my server. It took a long time to run the full set of tests ...