Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      17 Apr 2006 11:40:03 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Oliver Iberien <oliver-mailinglist@charter.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Newbie question - using sysinstall "Upgrade an existing system" - easy?
Message-ID:  <44u08s2oto.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <200604160947.21921.oliver-mailinglist@charter.net>
References:  <200604160947.21921.oliver-mailinglist@charter.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Oliver Iberien <oliver-mailinglist@charter.net> writes:

> What actually happens when you use "Upgrade an existing system" in
> sysinstall?  Do you end up with the X-server, etc., all functioning
> as before, or is there a lot of cleanup to do afterwards?

X doesn't get automatically updated by that path; just the base
system.  So your old X setup should work fine; it will be untouched.
Of course, upgrades are *always* a good reason to have an *extra* set
of backups.

> (In my case, this would be from 6.0 to 6.1, whenever the release version of 
> 6.1 comes out. I am getting DMA errors in trying to install a second drive, 
> and posts from this list give the impression that changing versions may make 
> a difference.)

It's possible.  Not likely, though; among the several more-probable
fixes, the Most Likely would be a new IDE cable.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44u08s2oto.fsf>