From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Aug 27 15:30:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C4F37B400 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107E43E6A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:30:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D59C72FC5; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0953C72D9E; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:28:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Santos Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this still actual? In-Reply-To: <3D6B9E78.6060407@myrealbox.com> Message-ID: <20020827152738.F68343-100000@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Santos wrote: > http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm and > http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1147/sam0108q/0108q.htm These benchmarks are not to be trusted. SysAdmin Magazine has refused to provide sufficient information to reconstruct their benchmarks externally for verification, which is the first step in publishing even a semi-scientific benchmark. Pretty much everyone, even the Windows folks, has deridied SysAdmin about these articles -- search around. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message