From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Oct 24 18:56:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12283 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 18:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.webspan.net (mail.webspan.net [206.154.70.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA12278 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (orion.webspan.net [206.154.70.5]) by mail.webspan.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA17148; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.webspan.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.webspan.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA07870; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:53:50 -0400 (EDT) To: "David H. Brierley" cc: Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Speed of access. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:32:14 EDT." Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:53:50 -0400 Message-ID: <7867.846208430@orion.webspan.net> Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "David H. Brierley" wrote in message ID : > On Thu, 24 Oct 1996, Steve wrote: > > > Actually enabling vj compression at the term server (not a freebsd) > > elliviated some of it. > > I have seen a bug in several implementations of PPP, including the one > that comes with FreeBSD, that would cause slowness if the remote end Which ``one'' ... there are *two* PPP implimentations in FreeBSD... Also, (a) which version of FreeBSD were you using, and (b) why don't I recall a PR about this? If we never get told this, how are we meant to fix it! (Appologies if there is a PR, but I can't remember seeing one off the top of my head) Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info