Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 May 2007 08:31:57 +0100
From:      Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>
To:        Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SoC
Message-ID:  <1179214317.1791.38.camel@zoot.mintel.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4649426F.8050601@u.washington.edu>
References:  <20070513040651.GB1017@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <4647F627.7020408@u.washington.edu> <20070514202922.GF1017@dwpc.dwlabs.ca> <4649426F.8050601@u.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 22:17 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Ruby's nice, but it's built on Perl so I have suspicions on its overall 
> usability / speed given my experience with Perl over the past 4 months 
> daily for work :(.. Ruby's just the new big thing for programming 
> languages, so everyone's into it. Kind of like how Java was compared to 
> C/C++ a few years back. But once everything dies down people will 
> realize that they'll still have to program in C/C++/Perl for real-world 
> applications.
> 
> Python seems better than Ruby from what I can see, but I really don't 
> like the mandatory indentation thing. Ew..
> 

Rubies are better Perls. That's the only connection between the two. One
day, a Japanese programmer got fed up with Perl, and wrote a better
language (for varying meanings of better).

Its not based or built on Perl in any respect.

Python and Ruby both have the same targets; to speed development time
and increase programmer productivity.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGSWHtlcRvFfyds/cRAu37AKCATd15WXhLM1Quf+yKBP4+MQBNmACfcow+
HdNnAn41oEfz50yBhxwOdAE=
=XB+h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1179214317.1791.38.camel>