From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 17:40:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E513816A420 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4AE43D58 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k18He6A5005308 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k18He69O005307; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:40:06 GMT Message-Id: <200602081740.k18He69O005307@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Frank Laszlo Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91911: [PATCH]: x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2: distfile unfetchable X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Laszlo List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:40:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91911; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Frank Laszlo To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, laszlof@vonostingroup.com, Alexander Leidinger Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91911: [PATCH]: x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2: distfile unfetchable Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:38:34 -0500 This port still is not working correctly, it tries to fetch "gtk2-2.4.14-4.fc3.3.amd64.rpm," which does not exist.. if it should be fetching the i386 distfile, the port needs to be modified to do this. I will work on a patch to get around this.. one thing that comes to mind is not using ARCH in the distfile names. Using something like SUB_ARCH will allow us to JUST change the DISTNAME, and not effect the rest of the build process. Cheers, Frank