From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:29:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D573016A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C641543D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C0TGip057191; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0C0TFFh057190; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20040112002915.GA57169@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <400155BB.4060801@cox.net> <200401111444.i0BEi9CJ013710@peedub.jennejohn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111444.i0BEi9CJ013710@peedub.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:29:17 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I see the same ID and REV with my VT8237. The weird thing is that > 0x05711106 is listed as the ID for the ATA_VIA82C571 in > /sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h. I wonder if VIA is recycling ID numbers? > Christ, that would be a real PITA! AFAIK, VIA only created an AGP controller for AMD64 -- they use their existing southbridges as VIA uses "V-Link" between their chips. So there was no need to create a new southbridge for AMD64. So I'm surprised there's a problem recognizing the ATA controller.