From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 16:11:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286D1C47 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.infocus-llc.com", Issuer "*.infocus-llc.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002FB2267 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 923B337B52E; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3hQ9NV5lNcz1td; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:10:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:10:50 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade and pkg 1.3 Message-ID: <20140802031050.GR1503@over-yonder.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:11:48 -0000 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 09:24:15AM +1200 I heard the voice of Jonathan Chen, and lo! it spake thus: > > portupgrade appears to be a lot slower with the pkg-1.3 when it goes > into its clean-up phase. The "pkg which -q ..." that portupgrade > performs during that phase appears to be taking quite a bit longer > that the older version did. This is a combo of "portupgrade beating the crap out of pkg" and "pkg beating the crap out of your disk". For tha latter, see a quick rundown at ; you can see the difference with/out the locking yourself with that command line. For the former, see a fix at which seems to eliminate it (at least, it should only slow down when it really has a lot of stuff to do). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.