From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 19 08:27:31 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA22057 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 08:27:31 -0700 Received: from redline.ru (root@mail.redline.ru [194.87.69.22]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA22050 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 08:27:19 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 19:25:00 +0400 (GMT+0400) From: Anthony Graphics X-Sender: agl@mail.redline.ru To: dennis cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, hsu@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Case for FreeBSD presentation docs? In-Reply-To: <199504190007.UAA04161@mail.htp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 18 Apr 1995, dennis wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 20:07:45 -0400 > From: dennis > To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu > Cc: hsu@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Case for FreeBSD presentation docs? > > > Something that might help in your case against LINUX...... > > We have recently announced a full suite of serial support for FreeBSD. Our > high performance serial controllers run up to T1 speeds (V.35, RS-449) and > we support > Cisco Serial Protocol, PPP, X.25 and Frame Relay. There is no comparable ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > product for LINUX (the Linux people have been swamping us with requests, but ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > we wanted to use FreeBSD internally because we think it is a much better > product). WAN networking is VERY important these days. > What good in the absence of the Linux support? The scope of the usage would be lower, what's so nice about it? AGL > > Dennis > Emerging Technologies, Inc. > >