From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 30 12:01:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD36537B404
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 30 May 2003 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7187243FCB
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 30 May 2003 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 12053 invoked by uid 1000); 30 May 2003 19:01:39 -0000
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030530142510.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20030530120101.C12034@root.org>
References: <XFMail.20030530142510.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/security/mac_mls mac_mls.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:01:40 -0000

On Fri, 30 May 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 30-May-2003 Robert Watson wrote:
> >   Make sure all character pointers are properly initialized; this was
> >   mismerged from the MAC tree, and didn't get picked up because warnings
> >   are not normally fatal in per-module builds, only when they are linked
> >   into a kernel (such as LINT).
>
> Can someone make module builds use the same warning flags and
> settings as kernel builds please?  This same scenario has happened
> numerous times now.

... to "me too".  :)

-Nate