From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  5 22:54:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BD54D16A4CE; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 22:54:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A443543D31; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 22:54:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (bms@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i65MsKIV079299;	Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:54:20 GMT
	(envelope-from bms@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bms@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i65MsKYS079295;
	Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:54:20 GMT
	(envelope-from bms)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:54:20 GMT
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200407052254.i65MsKYS079295@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: bms@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bms@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/56165: if_baudrate is not correct for rl, xl, dc and some
	other network interfaces
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:54:20 -0000

Synopsis: if_baudrate is not correct for rl, xl, dc and some other network interfaces

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->bms
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 5 22:53:30 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I'll take this.

This is harder than it sounds on the face of it because miibus
autonegotiation can change the effective baud rate and this would
have to be handled elsewhere...

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56165