From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Dec 10 23:17:40 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA23415 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA23405 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost) by scanner.worldgate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with UUCP id AAA21198; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:17:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.ampr.ab.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA26378; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:16:11 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:16:10 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko X-Sender: marcs@alive.ampr.ab.ca To: "Paul Andersen (ML)" cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Paul Andersen (ML) wrote: > Does anyone have any decent scripts for a good system backup using > tar? I'd use dump but I'm not happy with some of the bugs they list. I'm "they"? IMHO, dump is many times better than tar for taking a good copy of a filesystem that not only has the data but that also puts the filesystem in the same state when you restore from tape. dump works at a lower level than tar, so it knows more about the filesystem so it does a better job of replicating it.