From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 23 13:46:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hyperhost.net (hyperhost.net [207.159.132.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1668837BD46 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 13:46:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patseal@hyperhost.net) Received: from foobar.foobar.eyep.net (postfix@p3.a8.du.radix.net [207.192.132.131]) by hyperhost.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14401 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 16:46:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by foobar.foobar.eyep.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4664E1380DB; Tue, 23 May 2000 16:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:43:42 -0400 From: Patrick Seal To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: PORTVERSION illegal? Message-ID: <20000523164342.A44612@hyperhost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD foobar.foobar.eyep.net 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Organization: Hyperhost Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In porting bashish portlint reports: (that's a lot of ports in one sentence!) FATAL: PORTVERSION looks illegal. should modify "SR1.1.1". Is SR1.1.1 illegal? should I change it to 1.1.1 and use DISTNAME? thanks, -- ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message