From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 15:59:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB74F16A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:59:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742B043D45 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truk@optonline.net) Received: from focus (ool-182e24b7.dyn.optonline.net [24.46.36.183]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with SMTP id <0I7A006KU4DBYT@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for java@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:58:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:56:21 -0500 From: Kurt Miller To: Panagiotis Astithas , java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <01d201c4cbf4$d15e6660$1d0110ac@focus> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <4199C80B.3090903@netmode.ntua.gr> Subject: Re: Sun offers snapshots of their next JDK's source code X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:59:05 -0000 From: "Panagiotis Astithas" > On another note, perhaps the distribution of JDK 5.0/6.0 patchsets > should be subject to the new Java Research License? It seems more open > source-friendly, not to mention shorter :-) The SCSL allows for "personal and individual use" of the JDK binaries in the 'Research Use License' via the 'Research Use' definition. Its not clear to me if the JRL grants the same thing. IANAL, but the definition of 'Research Use' in the JRL doesn't seem to include unqualified personal and individual use like the SCSL does. If this is the case, I think the SCSL may be the better license for the patchsets. -Kurt