From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 24 12:50: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B9637B404 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2OKo3R25112; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203242050.g2OKo3R25112@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alan Eldridge Subject: Re: ports/36254: Conflicting function definition with standard libraries Reply-To: Alan Eldridge Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36254; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alan Eldridge To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/36254: Conflicting function definition with standard libraries Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:45:29 -0500 On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:40:09PM -0800, Alan Eldridge wrote: > 1. teTex should not be using the libwww in its own tree; according to the > Makefile, it should be using the installed port, instead. > > Problem is with submitter's system; need to see full configure and > make logs to determine what actually happened. I am using 4.5-STABLE from 3/11 myself, and the port correctly builds, and does not use the internal libwww code, so problem being submitter's configuration is confirmed. -- AlanE "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message