From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 10:18:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B816A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:18:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns3.tele-kom.ru (ns3.tele-kom.ru [217.107.251.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A38343D1F for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:18:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 10585 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 09:15:54 -0000 Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (213.80.148.6) by ns.tele-kom.ru with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 09:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 43959 invoked by uid 555); 21 Jun 2004 10:18:30 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.149.142) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1087813109-43934 for list@arameus.net; Mon, 21 Jun 14:18:29 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C39B38D; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:18:14 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:18:14 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Jan Muenther Message-ID: <20040621101813.GA6399@Shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Zaharchenko , Jan Muenther , Edd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001701c4575d$edb47c20$0200a8c0@LLAPTOP> <200406210740.i5L7ekg17714@server1.web-mania.com> <20040621081202.GA1538@localghost.muenther.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040621081202.GA1538@localghost.muenther.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Edd Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] Silly Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:18:23 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:12:02AM +0200, Jan Muenther probably wrote: > > fsck is what your looking for. > >=20 > > To find out more type: > > man fsck >=20 > Hm, not really. UFS doesn't fragment as hard as FAT or NTFS do, so there'= s no > need to actively defragment it. Just a small correction: fsck has nothing to do with fragmentation (if only reporting it), it does integrity checking. > It's just a tad bit more clever with block allocation than those other fi= le- > systems.=20 > You don't need to run fsck manually, on a regular basis. You really don't need to do that, but it's because the ffs filesystem is more clever at being consistent than FAT, and not because it's cleverer at allocating blocks (though it certainly is). HTH, --=20 DoubleF But soft you, the fair Ophelia: Ope not thy ponderous and marble jaws, But get thee to a nunnery -- go! -- Mark "The Bard" Twain --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA1rXlwo7hT/9lVdwRAsJ1AJ94CZJSDmLWWcDo1hxqYCY6hQYR8QCfaQMq t0Aq26PWcli7jU6WfDdkKMw= =FnV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--