From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 11 12:22:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975)
	id 8FEA01065670; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:22:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:22:53 +0000
From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>
To: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110111122253.GC57172@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201101110751.p0B7psXk085874@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20110111075157.D91781065788@hub.freebsd.org>
	<20110111091109.GB57172@FreeBSD.org>
	<AANLkTinCA6juUbRFnWXcYmz6uz-WmTrHzOqzAUPws82h@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinCA6juUbRFnWXcYmz6uz-WmTrHzOqzAUPws82h@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [ports] cvs commit: ports/devel/rubygem-stringex Makefile
	distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:22:53 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:36:26PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> PORTEPOCH was not bumped by me.
> 
> Or you mean I shall bump PORTEPOCH ?

I think you should bump PORTEPOCH as described in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN556

But danfe@ said this is unnecessary in this case.

-- 
Sergey A. Osokin
osa@FreeBSD.ORG

> 2011/1/11, Sergey A. Osokin <osa@freebsd.org>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:51:57AM +0000, Wen Heping wrote:
> >> wen         2011-01-11 07:51:54 UTC
> >>
> >>   FreeBSD ports repository
> >>
> >>   Modified files:
> >>     devel/rubygem-stringex Makefile distinfo
> >>   Log:
> >>   - Revert my last commit to avoid break other ports.
> >>
> >>   Reported by:    pgollucci@
> >>
> >>   Revision  Changes    Path
> >>   1.5       +1 -1      ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile
> >>   1.5       +2 -2      ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/distinfo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >>
> >>
> >> Index: ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile
> >> diff -u ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.4
> >> ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.5
> >> --- ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.4	Tue Jan 11 07:01:33 2011
> >> +++ ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile	Tue Jan 11 07:51:54 2011
> >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> >>
> >>  # XXX: datamapper requires exact version ~>
> >>  PORTNAME=	stringex
> >> -PORTVERSION=	1.2.0
> >> +PORTVERSION=	1.1.0
> >>  PORTEPOCH=	1
> >
> > Does this changes (i.e. revert back) make sense to bump PORTEPOCH?
> >
> > --
> > Sergey A. Osokin
> > osa@FreeBSD.ORG
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????