From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 2 20:46:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA11716 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 20:46:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dragonk.dtgnet.com (rap-dialup-8.dtgnet.com [216.16.6.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA11708 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 20:46:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dragonknight@dtgnet.com) Received: from dtgnet.com (localhost.dtgnet.com [127.0.0.1]) by dragonk.dtgnet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00745 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 1999 21:43:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from dragonknight@dtgnet.com) Message-ID: <368EF58A.661DFFF6@dtgnet.com> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 21:43:54 -0700 From: "Dragon Knight ][" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress 100 References: <199901020748.XAA20409@implode.root.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Greenman wrote: > > >Is there a serious enough difference between the two to expect this, or > > Yes, they are completely different and based on different NICs. > > >Would it be compatible with the EtherExpress Pro/10 (since the network > >doesn't support 100 yet, this would be ok)? Is there a driver somewhere > >for the regular EtherExpress Pro/100? Or am I just up a creek? > > No. No. Yes. > > -DG While on the subject I have seen several different models of the EtherExpress Pro around. Or cards claiming to be different models at the least. I have heard good things about the Pro/100B, and am planning to order a couple 3 or 4. How can I be sure I am getting the /100B? Perhaps a chipset? Thanks, Samuel Greear To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message