From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 4 17:19:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911A21065676 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CF58FC19 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so3850827ewy.43 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ujaIp9D2Z9NgJwau0pIaz5hhBss1MJKo6aqQZW+WRPU=; b=KROlSGwWZl4vOgF2735ZTXkFz4HlyYmRpfTbecRnaRq7hiDwSqKjo7tlEoeYkXgKHX d6TPeoeESh5NHi0Os8fYrsbdDupg6JV84vl52Q/0biGJeoNE5O+oyZMw8nygKiKpi9+e IHMax9iCsBW1Xi/SsmUACei5DMugGYpypztDU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tlmflUcRiwN0l9xt6cI9FJyL/TxTwRSQqF05KOJ727hf/wkIKVRFwrf4RvM1nPfR3t 23vmB8on0+L8FpGa7yH7uVDDS2TIBEKsYCdKOV8y9mg/l5p4rHKIpRoWqnI3srRYcesf i+R6+yxvA+5xMw0CHqktFSo97MwbS1+saxv2c= Received: by 10.210.86.1 with SMTP id j1mr9169975ebb.27.1249406376007; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm3757387eyz.21.2009.08.04.10.19.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:19:32 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090804181932.35562195@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660908040942t6f7934detdeb7b138623eb884@mail.gmail.com> References: <64c038660908031928v15a76d15g5599e6f3fef936e1@mail.gmail.com> <200908032220.50964.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090804173939.598a224f@gumby.homeunix.com> <64c038660908040942t6f7934detdeb7b138623eb884@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Secure password generation...blasphemy! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:19:38 -0000 On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:42:22 -0600 Modulok wrote: > As I understand it I would have to double the length of a hashed > password for it to be as secure as an un-hashed one, as each pair of > characters represent one byte. Aye? I wouldn't put it quite like that, it's the hexadecimal representation that puts one bytes into two characters not the hashing.