From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 06:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052016A4CE; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B9143D46; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:06:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i25E6DQE049852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:06:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i25E62Ql049851; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:06:02 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:06:02 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: James Message-ID: <20040305140602.GB49148@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , James , Wes Peters , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040303181034.GA58284@scylla.towardex.com> <20040304131000.GA41474@cell.sick.ru> <20040304172529.GA86502@scylla.towardex.com> <20040304172651.GA86659@scylla.towardex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040304172651.GA86659@scylla.towardex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Andre Oppermann cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:06:17 -0000 On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:26:51PM -0500, James wrote: J> > that was my thought initially, BUT.. actually... you can J> > actually do this no problem using mrtd dumps and pick it up with a J> > program via bgp device :P no need to create another api it seems :) J> J> errr??? I meant bpf device... Implementing traffic accounting like ip accounting or netflow through a bpf is generally a bad idea, because of poor performance of such a solution. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE