From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 17:30:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844E416A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BF943D41 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslanbsd@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so237469wra for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=NsOOG5ybcC27NCDZFm7nD6F8G0gxHSlN5tWKboagH8saWJ6nwKYXlJSnk6BJjGNFs+rIgY3fJviNO++7rRfqN84bwa+MX/44sguezOsxbMMiXwW7dZmBDFcwDILIRrDkGvrQwV9j2AzmxhOYerWs0VJ7xoP508mkSCEcs3MDQxc= Received: by 10.54.35.71 with SMTP id i71mr611817wri; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.99.7 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <319cceca05033009305c410e85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:47 -0800 From: mohamed aslan To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050329224603.GD86797@nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <319cceca0503281001792baf39@mail.gmail.com> <1112135353.749.84.camel@localhost> <20050329224603.GD86797@nowhere> Subject: Re: organization X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mohamed aslan List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:30:53 -0000 i cann't reply to all of ur comments but , that is what makes u break off , as DragonFly split of u u took my opinion as an attack, u just wanna flaming, u also got off topic "CVS and SVN", my words were really facts Mr Scott , Linux layout is better than FreeBSD layout , FreeBSD performance it better than Linux one , and thnx for silly reply. that's why i hate forums and maillists and i should mail this directly to the core members. On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:04 -0600, Craig Boston wrote: > At the risk of going further and further off-topic from > freebsd-hackers... > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:29:13PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Sounds like a bad situation there. On our server we use svn+ssh, except > > for a few Windows clients that use https. (BTW our server is running > > 4-STABLE and it's wonderful.) > > Hmmm, I initially didn't want to use that because I read that it suffers > from the same security issues as CVS. The appeal of being able to > fine-tune permissions and grant subversion access without shell access > is quite luring. > > HTTP timeouts during long operations, on the other hand, suck. ( my > server is woefully underpowered :-D ). > > Note to davsvn users with slow servers: http-timeout = 3600 is your > friend. > > > Heh. :-) 1.1.3 is current now, but one can find mentions of a 1.1.4 > > bugfix release being planned, as well as the (farther out) 1.2 release > > with locking. > > Oh, I've been running 1.1.3 on both client and server since it went into > ports (many dump/loads later). Just haven't taken the time to see > what's new and compare to older versions. :) > > Craig > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm Searching For Perfection, So Even If U Need Portability U've To Use Assembly ;-) http://www.maslanlab.org