From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Aug 10 11:37:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05534
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (joelh@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.64])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA05528
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12GNU) id OAA09590; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 14:37:30 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 14:37:30 -0400
Message-Id: <199708101837.OAA09590@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To: sef@Kithrup.COM
CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199708101739.KAA17243@kithrup.com> (message from Sean Eric Fagan
	on Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:39:19 -0700)
Subject: Re: variable sized arrays and gcc
From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> The feature will now make it into the next ANSI C version.  (Along with a
> bunch of stuff that is *WRONG* and *EVIL*.  But this particular feature I
> happen to like.)

Like what?

-- 
Second law of programming:
Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped