From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 22 17:19:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA17189 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:19:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from sink.majesticnet.com (host17.majestic.sysci.org [205.227.182.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA17160; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:19:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ian@sink.majesticnet.com) Received: (from ian@localhost) by sink.majesticnet.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA01524; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:19:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2-beta-102697 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199712211800.KAA26740@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:19:23 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Struble To: Bill Fenner Subject: RE: Unfetchable distfiles reminder Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk OK, I have finally started to payback a little to the ports collection. And incase anyone sitting on the sidelines wants to know, it is a rather satisfying thing to be doing with my idle clock cycles! I started digging around the unfetchables list and send a few diffs to a few maintainers and also submitted ports/5366 for net/zircon. I started looking at math/blas as well but kind of got stuck a little. Here is the situation, the first distsite (netlib.bell-labs.com) now stores the files as a .gz file instead of .Z. Normally wouldn't be much of a problem but the other distsite (ftp.netlib.org) stores the files with out any comression but will compress files to .Z if requested but will not gzip on the fly. My question is should we nuke the bell-labs distsite and add another or is it being left for historical reasons? Ian On 21-Dec-97 Bill Fenner wrote: > > Dear porters, > > This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of > unfetchable distfiles at http://www.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . > In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile > problems is > > http://www.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ports@freebsd.org.html > > Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get > fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. > > Thanks for your help! > > Bill "distfiles" Fenner