Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 16:44:33 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: jbo@insane.engineer Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, fluffy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports version Message-ID: <YlWQUYhAq1c7zS%2Bu@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <oqyLAyJIPLyPZqXCEh2rOXAc0YdZep18CW13nMMq8WHJx9yQ6IKAQq-FWkiYXmrwmmxiTzQv7fSmbQW7a24rqZh2PQ0QgWY762WXBwz3e1I=@insane.engineer> References: <oqyLAyJIPLyPZqXCEh2rOXAc0YdZep18CW13nMMq8WHJx9yQ6IKAQq-FWkiYXmrwmmxiTzQv7fSmbQW7a24rqZh2PQ0QgWY762WXBwz3e1I=@insane.engineer>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > The various boost ports (C++ libraries) available are currently on upstream version 1.72 whereas the current release would be 1.78. > > I'd like to understand whether there is a technical reason for the FreeBSD ports being "so far behind"? Somewhat, yes. There's a PR for the update: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246106 The cause of the delay is this: If we update boost, we test-build all the depends. If there are errors, the maintainers of those depending ports should fix those errors. That's not always easy, possible or the maintainer is busy with other things. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YlWQUYhAq1c7zS%2Bu>