From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 22:01:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B106E16A468 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A3E13C458 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADA446EFA; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:01:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:01:22 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Maksim Yevmenkin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070709230022.D9997@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070613150534.D83504@fledge.watson.org> <20070613.212825.-957834923.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: HEADS UP: IPX over IP support removed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:01:24 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > On 6/13/07, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <20070613150534.D83504@fledge.watson.org> >> Robert Watson writes: >> : ng_h4 - Bluetooth serial drivers -- I know of no on-going work here >> >> Isn't emax working on this? I didn't notice it before now... > > ok, i have the code, but i can not test it. my old xircom cbt pccard no > longer gets recognized :( i asked Warner for assistance. > > in the mean time, if anyone has working serial bluetooth device please let > me know. > > if i cant get this code tested in time, what should i do? commit untested > code or just retire ng_h4(4) for now? Max, Just realized you had a question in here, which I must have missed in the previous pass. What we're doing for i4b and netatm is leaving the code in the tree, but disconnecting it from the build for 7.0. So if things don't come together in time, we can just do that. I'm currently preparing a netatm patch, and Bjoern now has the i4b patch in the tree, so the ng_h4 bits are the only ones left after that. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge