From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 13:37:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FDA16A421; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C475213C442; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=nexii.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IvvC2-00069g-IQ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:37:10 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98D1703E; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EF234339; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20071124133656.GA47819@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Dupre , Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:04 -0000 * Alex Dupre (ale@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more > > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? > And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the > default/recommended method today. I would think of both. I personally prefer c[v]sup because it doesn't delete custom patches, which I have a dozen. -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru