Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:36:13 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 263649] databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0
Message-ID:  <bug-263649-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263649

            Bug ID: 263649
           Summary: databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ports@skyforge.at
                CC: gd.workbox@gmail.com
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(gd.workbox@gmail.com)
                CC: gd.workbox@gmail.com
 Attachment #233576 maintainer-approval?(gd.workbox@gmail.com)
             Flags:

Created attachment 233576
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D233576&action=
=3Dedit
databases/py-hiredis: Update to 2.0.0

This patch updates databases/py-hiredis to 2.0.0. I've adapted the fixes
necessary for setup.py to use our shipped version of databases/hiredis in p=
lace
of the internal vendored one (which is used by default), but I am honestly =
not
entirely sure I've gotten it right and would appreciate some feedback on th=
is.

The port builds with databases/hiredis 1.0.2 that was submitted in bug 2636=
47.
I've managed to run the tests against the installed package, where it works
fine, but for some reason was unable to get test.py to pass in the test sta=
ge
against the local build, hence I've not been able to include a test target.=
 :/

Since the port doesn't build with the current hiredis version in port I've =
been
thinking of adding a version bound on databases/hiredis, but I'm not sure h=
ow
to do that with LIB_DEPENDS. :/

Any feedback on this is greatly appreciated. I will probably try and test t=
his
with a synapse worker setup to get some more reliable/in-production testing
done as well.

Cheers,
Sascha

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263649-7788>