From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Tue Nov 10 17:09:11 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C085A2BEEF;
 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3767C17F8;
 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD4B28428;
 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:09:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-89-177-49-111.net.upcbroadband.cz
 [89.177.49.111])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90F9A2840C;
 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <564224A8.6030507@quip.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:08:56 +0100
From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>,
 Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8r?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?grav?= <des@des.no>
CC: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN
References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641BFC4.7050208@digiware.nl>
 <86a8qm9l9b.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641D00E.501@digiware.nl>
 <86611a9kj6.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641D419.5090103@digiware.nl>
 <1447171330.3672217.435085401.40D8E7F2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1447171330.3672217.435085401.40D8E7F2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:09:11 -0000

Mark Felder wrote on 11/10/2015 17:02:

[...]

>> But like I said: The code I found at openssh was so totally different
>> that I did not continued this track, but chose to start running openssh
>> from ports. Which does not generate warnings I have questions about the
>> originating ip-nr.
>>
>>>> Are they still willing to accept changes to the old version that is
>>>> currently in base?
>>>
>>> No, why would they do that?
>>
>> Exactly my question....
>> I guess I misinterpreted your suggestion on upstreaming patches.
>>
>> --WjW
>>
>
> I honestly think everyone would be better served by porting blacklistd
> from NetBSD than trying to increase verbosity for log files.

I didn't know blacklistd. It seems very interesting. It would be nice if 
somebody will port it to FreeBSD.

Miroslav Lachman