From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 3 09:21:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261F416A423; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (mailgate.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCA143D8A; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from herring.rabson.org (herring.rabson.org [80.177.232.250]) by itchy.rabson.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k039KwpS064035; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:20:59 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) From: Doug Rabson To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:20:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <73774.1136109554@critter.freebsd.dk> <20060102.221046.75255380.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060103061752.GE42228@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20060103061752.GE42228@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601030920.57890.dfr@nlsystems.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1225/Mon Jan 2 17:54:07 2006 on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Peter Jeremy , current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: FreeBSD handles leapsecond correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:21:50 -0000 On Tuesday 03 January 2006 06:17, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, 2006-Jan-02 22:10:46 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > >Leap seconds are hard and I hate them. > > Which of the competing alternatives would you prefer? I think we should fit gigantic rocket motors around the equator and use them to regularlise the earth's spin :-)