Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:20:56 +0000 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>, current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD handles leapsecond correctly Message-ID: <200601030920.57890.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20060103061752.GE42228@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <73774.1136109554@critter.freebsd.dk> <20060102.221046.75255380.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060103061752.GE42228@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 06:17, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, 2006-Jan-02 22:10:46 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > >Leap seconds are hard and I hate them. > > Which of the competing alternatives would you prefer? I think we should fit gigantic rocket motors around the equator and use them to regularlise the earth's spin :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601030920.57890.dfr>