From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 27 07:26:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A974337B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cadillac.meteo.fr (cadillac.meteo.fr [137.129.1.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D91F43F75
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr)
Received: from cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost.meteo.fr [127.0.0.1])
	OAA25435	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:26:00 GMT
Received: from xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr (xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.150.2])
	QAA02407;	Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:25:54 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr (exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr
	[137.129.157.46]) by xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/8.7.1)
	id QAA12046; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:26:28 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h5RENAZM054000;	Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pokrovsi@exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr)
Received: (from pokrovsi@localhost)
	by exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5RENAkD053999;
	Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:23:09 +0200
From: Igor Pokrovsky <igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr>
To: Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it>
Message-ID: <20030627142309.GA53974@exmatis1.cnrm.meteo.fr>
References: <20030627135944.GC634@cobweb.example.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030627135944.GC634@cobweb.example.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Accept-Language: ru
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (cti825/CNRM)
Organization: METEO FRANCE(CNRM)
cc: trhodes@freebsd.org
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: peter@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by
	ldconfig(8) ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Igor Pokrovsky <igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr>
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:26:05 -0000

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:59:44PM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
> I gave a quick look at the ldconfig source and it seems to me that
> /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld-elf.so.conf are not used anymore.
> 
> During system startup ldconfig is passed the path set by "ldconfig_paths"
> in /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
> 
> If I am correct, could somebody fix the man page? It is misleading.

I agree, but may be it's better to fix ldconfig source to
in order to use /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld-elf.so.conf?

-- 
Igor