From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 19 11:07:41 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D88E1065674
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:07:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bounces@nabble.com)
Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089C08FC15
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:07:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156])
	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounces@nabble.com>) id 1OaoCC-0002r3-Ca
	for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:07:40 -0700
Message-ID: <29203466.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nikolay Dmukha <cosmic17@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <slrni4864g.2bj1.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-From: cosmic17@gmail.com
References: <28778099.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<slrni4864g.2bj1.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
Subject: Re: pf nat & ipfw kernel nat & ng_nat - what uses less computer
 resources?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:07:41 -0000


Thanks for your reply. 
I think I`ll use ipfw kernel nat. But first I would like to test nat through
iptables in Linux to compare the results. I read that in iptables there is
some special option (config_ip_nf_conntract). It is very interesting for me
what is the difference in work with and without this option.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/pf-nat---ipfw-kernel-nat---ng_nat---what-uses-less-computer-resources--tp28778099p29203466.html
Sent from the freebsd-performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.