From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Wed Mar 1 09:36:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4ABCF378F for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r@robakdesign.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A944CC8 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r@robakdesign.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A584BCF378E; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: git@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52A7CF378D for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r@robakdesign.com) Received: from mail-vk0-f47.google.com (mail-vk0-f47.google.com [209.85.213.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CC9C6 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r@robakdesign.com) Received: by mail-vk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k127so6167741vke.0 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:36:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uDmmVrQwzOSnbQYsQYzYkmA+45eBWugKfgEypQU0+0s=; b=N5cBSNY5hM/8g8Jt42jRY5UKU+yx+zchSHih/2NS7vRqsnLfrqB3j8GavfryYtit9d 1jnOdobwbQfeyBn2S5oQaXW19wIeLI5yGL5JYiAIF0iwOPl07gzRVPs+7kPSwQMNma/C 6cBNBhjkN+FKkJR4WEmib5eriZVafTF5sneWr3szY9C9hwKcLXDtRzwmctFnUFlgUPvR QKYntr9/rII9EWcbJjFutDQYVZNyXjZkVqeOUIBmIGF76F//cfvHDbFYjA5XNjeS5D4d Uy+iIVahtQ2uU5ppg1H+WdW+aXygO0a3eHlCHUkjNM4nxTwDgqqBdhrBdNIDe9rk0vDc 9xpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l4DqDk5ZkvdkA60fCZSN0dtSGZEtbmMAbL+4QsW+vyc/eEgwlBz+noocuw4FMZZA== X-Received: by 10.31.236.6 with SMTP id k6mr2693223vkh.144.1488361008005; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com (mail-vk0-f43.google.com. [209.85.213.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x31sm897994uax.9.2017.03.01.01.36.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t8so6186157vke.3 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:36:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.31.93.66 with SMTP id r63mr3196829vkb.126.1488361007165; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:36:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.11.6 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 01:36:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bart=C5=82omiej_Rutkowski?= Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:36:26 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: pull requests To: Warner Losh Cc: git@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:36:55 -0000 On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > So, policy on github pull requests. > > Do we have one? > > If not, I'm going to set a sensible one and publish. Or set one and > get you folks to review. I'd like to see us down to 0 open pull > requests by the end of March. > > Warner > What kind of policy, regarding what and 'policing' what and how exactly? Who and how will enforce such policy and on whom? In the end, "we can't force anyone to do anything" so unless we commit to do something on GitHub, I'd see it as a dead law. Not to mention I've got a feeling this is completely disconnected from the general direction that I think has been 'agreed', that is we'll have a software solution getting GH PR's into Phabric reviews and GH Issues into Bugzilla PR's automatically. What then, shouldn't it be more like Phabric reviews/Bugzilla PR policy instead? Kind regards, Bartek Rutkowski