From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 11 18:42:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA19654 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 18:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clipper.cs.kiev.ua (root@cs-demon-64k.cs.kiev.ua [193.124.48.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA19641 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 18:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dog by clipper.cs.kiev.ua with uucp id m0ueX6m-0004y0C; Fri, 12 Jul 96 04:33 WET DST Received: (from dk@localhost) by dog.farm.org (8.7.5/dk#3) id QAA15154; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 16:56:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 16:56:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk Message-Id: <199607112056.QAA15154@dog.farm.org> To: troy@circle.net (Troy Arie Cobb) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permission denied Newsgroups: cs-monolit.gated.lists.freebsd.stable Organization: FARM Computing Association Reply-To: dk+@ua.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article you wrote: > > When I compile 2.1-STABLE with IPFIREWALL any networking > > operation produces ``permission denied'' message. Any clues? > The new default for IPFW is deny all. > You'll need to permit a few ports/ips to get anything to work. how this all works if my firewall machine is booting diskless over NFS? (yes, _my_ firewall machine works just this way.) -- There is no human problem which could not be solved if people would simply do as I advise. -Gore Vidal