From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 17:20:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717E1065672; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29BC8FC19; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so960266wwf.1 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HDy871jlL4CWiemC3ZlSsL5rK9m2C89LoYPTMnky7lw=; b=uZomNETizKX332VxgvV5QhMESV/XSgzad4KydMKqSbdngKMpxXDe7UvasMSTvnpUzn h0QWbR8lgA4me9gAeFnn6u9m+XfSAWyRyKvIbS4ZVfXeB66+aaGYHJ8lasBNcxcAyaFe czMbwyIHhnUyVhS6sc7cjh7b7oZVU7F6idBms= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.198.77 with SMTP id en13mr12776046wbb.28.1320338700819; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.94.106 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:45:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4EAF18B2.9040909@FreeBSD.org> <4EAF6442.5020901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:45:00 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current Subject: Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:20:38 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton wrote: > >>> In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if >>> it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. >> >> Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first. > > I'll poke them tomorrow, but since others have merged in driver > changes and other stuff into -HEAD, I wouldn't be the first person to > merge in bigger things. > Maybe not the place to ask, but why are you (ie. FreeBSD folks) unable to unleash commit to `trunk' and let only required MFC go to `stable/9' ? - Arnaud