From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 10 22:32:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C46637B719; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBA13E09; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:32:23 -0800 (PST) To: Peter Wemm Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ps@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates In-Reply-To: <200103110611.f2B6BNh25090@mobile.wemm.org>; from peter@netplex.com.au on "Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:11:23 -0800" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:32:23 -0800 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010311063223.CBBA13E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm writes: > The version of the patch for -current uses the softdep mount option only. > If you remove the mount option, you dont get softupdates. In this case, it might be better to just turn it on by default and let those who don't want it somewhere use "nosoftdep"; this is what mckusick originally agreed to. Here's his e-mail on the subject: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=404219+417718+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-arch/20000702.freebsd-arch Otherwise, the backwards-compatible stuff for -stable sounds good. Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message