From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 20:27:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44811065674 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob6.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob6.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:53f0::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEA08FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/afgnrylsiW20cSl/o2Q= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from britannica.bec.de (ip-109-45-32-235.web.vodafone.de [109.45.32.235]) by post.strato.de (jimi mo40) (RZmta 25.8) with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPA id L0254en2RJ79RA for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:27:42 +0200 (MEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:27:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:27:38 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110327202738.GB30694@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Unsigned wchar_t X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:27:46 -0000 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote: > Hello hackers@ > > I'm working on getting FreeBSD working with the ARM EABI. As part of > this the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture (AAPCS) > defines wchar_t as an unsigned int. Does someone at ARM actually get paid to define ABIs that are different from what everyone else is doing? Didn't we learn anything from the problems of char vs signed char vs unsigned char? Joerg