From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 30 04:21:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A040F16A41A; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA9D13C442; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA151A4D7C; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A8E03BA4A; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:21:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:21:32 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dirk Meyer Message-ID: <20070730042132.GA95190@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <200706261648.l5QGmc0v079236@repoman.freebsd.org> <200706261648.l5QGmc0v079236@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070729183544.GC90318@rot26.obsecurity.org> <20070729211137.GA90226@rot26.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/meta1 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:21:33 -0000 On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 05:46:22AM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > > > > > > | +MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD= needs hostname > > > > > > > > Why does the package need a hostname? Often this is a bug, and either > > > > way the preferred solution is to fix it so it can be packaged. > > > > > > Ports failed in configure state, > > > as the empty hostname breaks some sanity checks. > > > > Yes, but why does the configure script need a hostname? In most cases > > it shouldn't be requiring one. > > This ist not most cases. > Some programs need to find out how the "hostname" command works. > If they get an empty result, this will fail. > > So rather them having pointyhat build bad packages, > I decided that users are better off without them. Sounds trivial to patch the configure script to skip the check since we know exactly how FreeBSD's hostname command works. Kris