From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 23:49:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FA216A41F for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27A43D48 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8SNn59D036297; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:49:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j8SNn5Ic036296; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:49:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:49:05 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20050928234905.GA36083@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200509241525.16173.max@love2party.net> <20050924192237.GP40237@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050928102153.GA86457@comp.chem.msu.su> <20050928032933.G16027@xorpc.icir.org> <20050928184731.GA72352@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050928184731.GA72352@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Max Laier Subject: Re: Bridges X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:49:09 -0000 On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:47:32AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > The problem is that the current bridge code only considers the MAC > address for forwarding. When VLANs are in use, this is incorrect as > both the MAC address and VLAN tag must be considered. The difference > is crucial when you have the same MAC address appearing in multiple > VLANs. This can occur when using DECnet Phase IV or Solaris with > Cassini NICs - both of which have a per-host MAC address rather than a > per-NIC MAC address. FWIW, this sounds quite reasonable to me. Indeed, there is plenty of good and not-so-good reasons for the same MAC address to appear on different VLANs, and it seems a licit case. -- Yar