From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 16 15: 5:25 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89F837B401 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:05:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DB9243EDE for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:05:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 47597 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Dec 2002 23:05:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:05:20 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: "Long, Scott" Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-Reply-To: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CC18@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Long, Scott wrote: > Most commits to HEAD do not need explicit approval from re@ at this > time. Yes. What goes in GENERIC is pretty important, however, due to potential interactions so it would be nice for such a change to not be made hastily. The trm(4) driver has not been around long also. > I noted the same concern as you on this one, but it's not as > critical an issue as if it had been committed to RELENG_5_0. Also, > to my knowledge, there is nothing wrong with this particular commit. > The release scripts need to be told about the trm driver so they > can do the right thing with the floppy disk builds, however. Yes, release/${arch}/drivers.conf need to be updated. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message