From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jul 13 6:40:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F34637C454; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:39:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13Ci6f-00025e-00; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:28:45 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13Ci6f-000It2-00; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:28:45 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:28:45 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: Brian Somers Cc: James Howard , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ? Message-ID: <20000713132845.C48641@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <200007130916.KAA00789@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200007130916.KAA00789@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Somers wrote: > Oops, sorry for the reply latency.... Don't worry, I've been side-tracked by docs stuff, committing things then thinking "am I allowed to do that?", etc. Fortunately I haven't been forced to wear the pointy hat yet. :-) > I don't think it's appropriate to separate the security script into=20 > multiple scripts unless the intention is to run ``periodic=20 > security''. This is just my personal view though. If you feel=20 > strongly about it, you should bring it up on freebsd-arch. I'll=20 > certainly back down if the concensus says it should be split. I don't really feel strongly, I just think it would be cleaner to have it separated out. Alternatively perhaps /etc/security could be moved to /etc/periodic/daily/.security, since it's just another daily script really. But that would mean a repo-copy and this probably isn't important enough to justify that, so let's leave it be. People are probably used to running '/etc/security' standalone as well. >> Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D >=20 > BTW, congrats on your commit bit ! Thanks. I took advantage of it to commit a question to the FAQ which James (on the cc list) asked recently: "what is a repo-copy?", let me know if it answers your question well enough. (it's in the misc questions bit.) --=20 Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D FreeBSD Documentation Project / --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: m7qH7zwKrsJvP360aTI/JYOHyBfPoZF7 iQCVAwUBOW21+ysPVtiZOS99AQFExgP9Ezg4b91D8T97FErt6HanEvE6iPSXOt92 x5Nt9yhreaQyyf4Ktj7NPNLYpmH6C5TcJX2gqDBe55cBMMIO/TzaOv6Fubb0DJ2s drpRy6AZO1ftkjP4W0WyQx9yW2sD+z5JwbHkSTzl6tk/dR21KNO4pKfOtmirbG4U BLn9fTAaSKQ= =DnFA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message