From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 31 23:35:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from giroc.albury.net.au (giroc.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E337B422 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 23:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nicks@localhost) by giroc.albury.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA05444; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:35:32 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:35:32 +1100 From: Nick Slager To: Andre Goeree Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: multiple tun devices while only 1 enabled in kernel Message-ID: <20000901173531.A94693@albury.net.au> References: <20000901082925.A907@freebee.attica.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000901082925.A907@freebee.attica.home>; from abgoeree@uwnet.nl on Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:29:25AM +0200 X-Homer: Whoohooooooo! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Andre Goeree (abgoeree@uwnet.nl): > Huh?, thought i had only 1 tun device configured....... > At least it's not what i expected, it should say something like > "device tun0 not available" (like in 3.4-R, don't know exactly > where it has been changed). tun devices are dynamically generated in FreeBSD 4.0 and above. I believe bpf devices are the same. Nick. -- From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680): "Workaround: don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message