From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 12:28:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ED316A4CE; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E3043D1F; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@krx.nl) Received: from minerva.krx.nl (a80-126-90-185.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.90.185]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAICSEpj020567; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:28:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from steve@krx.nl) Received: by minerva.krx.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F8E35D3; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:28:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:28:15 +0100 From: Steven Looman To: Tobias Roth Message-ID: <20041118122815.GA51723@minerva.krx.nl> References: <20041118083528.GA50416@minerva.krx.nl> <20041118091927.GA28763@speedy.unibe.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041118091927.GA28763@speedy.unibe.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port/74038: mod_shapvh X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:28:17 -0000 I am aware of this, but the module itself won't change anymore. If you really want to, go ahead and use me (steven@krx.nl) as a maintainer. Steven Looman On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:19:28AM +0100, Tobias Roth wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Steven Looman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, I guess so. Unless this is not appropriate? Some other www/mod_ ports have the same maintainer. > > you yourself should be the maintainer. meaning that you are responsible > for keeping the port up to date when new versions of the original app are > released or when the port breaks for some other reason (eg gcc updates). > the latter happens quite rarely. > > if you specify apache@freebsd.org, this means the apache guys are > responsible, but no one in specific. this is generally a bad idea as > we already have enough ports without a maintainer (those that list > ports@freebsd.org as their maintainer). > > cheers, t. >