From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Sep 9 17:24:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351AD37B400 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org [64.239.180.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6EB43E42 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:24:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8A0NF136828; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:23:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org) Message-Id: <200209100023.g8A0NF136828@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Terry Lambert Cc: "Neal E. Westfall" , Giorgos Keramidas , Joshua Lee , dave@jetcafe.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:23:10 -0700 From: Dave Hayes Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Terry Lambert writes: > You keep saying that it's unintelligible, but literally many > thousands of scientists don't find it to be unintelligible. > Why do you say that it's unintelligible? Why don't they say > the same thing? The answer has to lie in the fact that you > and they don't share some fundamental assumptions. One of which might be that "scientists must be right, they're scientists." ;) ------ Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb and doesn't have an air force." --some letter-writer in the Manchester Guardian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message