From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 21:40:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FAF16A420 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:40:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A4843D45 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IV300ENSYV89D80@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:40:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.202.174.136]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0IV3007I2YV8S940@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:40:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:40:24 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <967b50260602220810j18d53d67xdb376994c2a23e9d@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060222224024.2308385e.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <967b50260602220810j18d53d67xdb376994c2a23e9d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: pvr250-port -> pvr500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:40:23 -0000 On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:10:58 +0100 Jan Branbergen wrote: > but suppose i created a GPL licensed port which patched the > pvr250-port, would this be a solution to the incompatibilities? IANAL, but I would very much like to see a pvr500 port, even if it is under the GPL. If it is possible at all, it should be looked into. Just my two cents. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway