From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 10 1:44:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3148537B401 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 68380 invoked by uid 1003); 10 Jan 2001 09:44:06 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:44:06 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Dan Langille Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how to test out cron.c changes? (was: cvs commit: src/etc crontab) Message-ID: <20010110114406.A64092@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <200101100820.VAA28529@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; <20010110112451.A52255@mithrandr.moria.org> <200101100935.WAA28697@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200101100935.WAA28697@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; from dan@langille.org on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:35:48PM +1300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 X-URL: http://mithrandr.moria.org/nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed 2001-01-10 (22:35), Dan Langille wrote: > That's a relatively smaller user-base compared to FreeBSD. Do you > consider that sufficient? I would, yes, considering it has been three years. You may feel free to disagree, of course, and I'll get to why next: > I don't see how the above relates to my point about sufficient testing. It > seems to be a repeat of what you've said before. I obviously agree sufficient testing is required. Luckily, we have -CURRENT for "sufficient testing". If it's an incredible concern, this change could be postponed to being in a release until 5.0; by then we'd have had our own testing for at least one DST change, and OpenBSD's testing for at least 7. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message