From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 20 15:03:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D2B1065692 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2431F8FC20 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from wald.nfv.gwdg.de ([134.76.242.31] helo=lt011.nfv) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lvv1N-0008Ow-9X; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <49EC8EA0.2080700@gwdg.de> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:02:56 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090404) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <49E98C97.9080602@gwdg.de> <10766735@ipt.ru> <49EB8968.3040004@gwdg.de> <91071496@serv3.int.kfs.ru> In-Reply-To: <91071496@serv3.int.kfs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SOLVED] acroread8 does not print any more X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:03:33 -0000 On 20.04.2009 13:05 (UTC+2), Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:28:24 +0200 Rainer Hurling wrote: >> On 19.04.2009 20:06 (UTC+2), Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> Rainer Hurling writes: >>> >>>> Since I am using the new linux emulator f8 I am not able to print with >>>> acroread8 any more. I get this behaviour on three different >>>> systems. The following message does appear in acroread: >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Beim Drucken ist folgender Fehler aufgetreten... >>>> '/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.6" not found, >>>> required by "libgcc_s.so.1"' >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Does anyone else see this error? >>>> >>>> I would suppose that /compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6 has to be used, but >>>> acroread is looking at /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6. Any >>>> suggestions what could be wrong? >>>> >>>> Let me know if I can give more information or test something. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> Rainer Hurling >>>> >>>> >>>> P.S.: I am running FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT with linux_base-f8 >>>> >>>> sysctl compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 >>>> >>>> /etc/make.conf >>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 >>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 >>>> >>>> >>>> #ls -d /var/db/pkg/linux* >>>> linux-f8-alsa-lib-1.0.15 >>>> linux-f8-jpeg-6b >>>> linux-flashplugin-9.0r159 >>>> linux-f8-atk-1.20.0 >>>> linux-f8-libsigc++20-2.0.18 >>>> linux-kmod-compat-20080408 >>>> linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14 >>>> linux-f8-libxml2-2.7.2 >>>> linux-nvu-1.0_1 >>>> linux-f8-dri-7.0.2 >>>> linux-f8-openssl-0.9.8b >>>> linux-realplayer-10.0.9.809.20070726 >>>> linux-f8-expat-2.0.1 >>>> linux-f8-pango-1.18.4 >>>> linux-scim-gtk-fc8-1.4.7_1 >>>> linux-f8-fontconfig-2.4.2 >>>> linux-f8-png-1.2.22 >>>> linux-scim-libs-fc8-1.4.7_2 >>>> linux-f8-gtk2-2.12.8 >>>> linux-f8-tiff-3.8.2 >>>> linux_base-f8-8_11 >>> Since you have two linux-scim-* ports it seems to me that you >>> upgraded to linux -f8- ports without reading /usr/ports/UPDATING >>> and there may be some unneeded remnants at /compat/linux. Can >>> you follow that procedure and write a followup here? >>> >>> BTW, some useful information you may find at emulation@ ML and >>> my "HEADSUP" message about new linux -f8- ports. > >> I deinstalled all linux packages and all dependencies, deleted >> completely /compat/linux and rebooted. After that I installed >> acroread, nvidia-driver, linux-flashplugin9 and mplayer again. > >> Interestingly enough the two linux-scim-* ports do excist again! It >> seems they are needed for acroread8. > > Are you sure that two _linux-scim-*_ ports exist but not two > _linux-f8-scim-*_ ports? New linux -f8- infrastructure uses > the latter: > ----- > % pwd > /usr/ports/print/acroread8 > % make all-depends-list | grep scim > /usr/ports/textproc/linux-f8-scim-gtk > /usr/ports/textproc/linux-f8-scim-libs > % You are right again. The new port names are linux-f8-scim-gtk-1.4.7 linux-f8-scim-libs-1.4.7 > ----- > >> But now I am able to print with acroread again! > > I'm glad your problem is solved. >> So you have been right with unneeded remnants at /compat/linux! When >> updating my excisting linux_base-f8 at 04/01/2009 to the newer one, I >> thought it was not neccessary to clean /compat/linux. But obviously it >> was. Thank you very much for this helpful information, > > It was not necessary to clean /compat/linux when updating > linux_base-f8 alone. But it is recommended while updating > from linux fc4 infrastructure ports to linux -f8- infrastructure > ports (i.e. while adding OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS variable to > /etc/make.conf). Since I was not sure if I cleaned /compat/linux when updating from fc4 month ago I did it now. > > WBR Thank you for all, Rainer